Wake
Up
Home

Editor's Note

Introduction

Current Index

Free Your Mind

The Future

Wake Up

Editorials

Alliance

Bizarre

The Staff

Photos

Community

Radio Silence

"Analog v. Digital"

By Derrick Warren

dwarren@excapethematrix.com

 

It’s almost hard to believe that the history of recorded music is only around a century old. We’ve come quite a ways since the first pressed vinyl record to streaming data from mp3 files through our iPods to our ears. Nowadays, studios are art laboratories in their own rights. Mixing boards can automatically readjust the knobs to a previous song’s specifications. Computers allow quick copy and paste jobs over botched takes. Even symphonies can be mimicked in today’s studio.

With so much now at your fingertips when recording, this doesn’t make the task of creating a piece any less difficult. One thing I will say is that contrary to popular belief, state of the art technology can’t do it all for you. Sure we have pop singers using pitch shifting software to get their voices in the correct register and even key. There’s a decline in authentic one-take performances on the actually LP itself (even on stage).

"To be honest, despite my own prejudice on the subject, that’s where it should be.  I admire the methods and finished product of old school recordings, but simply as an art form, music must move forward."

The simpler times of recording before digital equipment was available weren’t a cakewalk. Analog tape recording equipment could be temperamental. One take perfection was mandatory. There wasn’t, "That sounded good, let’s drag that into this bar." If you missed a queue or hit a sour note, you were playing the song over, no matter where you were in the arrangement.

Analog equipment demanded perfection from not only the producer behind the boards, but from the singers, the bass players, the drummers, the trianglist, or what have you. Members of the "Funk Brothers," the sound behind every Motown hit up until 1975, boasted and lamented on their recording practices. Songs were often arranged on the spot and were played until recorded; then they went to the next one.

As times progressed, producers and musicians alike began pushing recording equipment and techniques to their boundaries. A lesser known producer by most musicians named Joe Meek created a "reverb room." Reverb being an effect that would give the applied instrument the sound of being either enclosed in a box or concert hall. By placing instruments and mics at different points in the room, he was able to have a different reverb effect in each of them.

Jimi Hendrix, as well as Jimmy Page pushed to see how many guitars and other instruments could be squeezed into a single song. Phil Spector (you know him now as "The Defendant") was also known by creating this HUGE wall of sound with the equipment of the day.

Of course as time goes on, more and more resources became available. The music industry would land into the digital era rather quickly. Understand that music and recording breakthroughs happen almost one right behind the other. While there were people embracing the new technology, there were those who believed that the old way was the way to go. Along with the new capabilities of the digital recording equipment, there was something else. The sound itself also changed. Some would simply say that the quality of the recording is better. Others say that it’s sterile.

Digital equipment is not only behind the boards, they are now integrating in the world of musical instruments. For guitarists who wish to have versatility in their tone, there are amps that digitally mimic or "model" other amps. This rings true for other instruments such as bass and drums as well. You can even now buy guitars that can sound like other guitars. Acoustic instruments can also include digital components.

"One thing I will say is that contrary to popular belief, state of the art technology can’t do it all for you."

How relevant is this issue in today’s music world? Depends on where the noise is coming from. Record companies of course are providing their artists with top of the line equipment. It is safe to say that most of today’s popular music rests in the realm of digital.

To be honest, despite my own prejudice on the subject, that’s where it should be.

I admire the methods and finished product of old school recordings, but simply as an art form, music must move forward. I, myself, have used digital equipment as well as recording in a computerized studio. What can I say, the equipment was cheaper. As the war rages on between the followers of both analog and digital, the rest of us will be waiting to see what new techniques and equipment will become available to us. And trust me, it will be used both above and under the crust.